Stephen E. Imm, Labor and Employment Attorney

The Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) is the Federal law that requires most employers to pay at least the “minimum wage” to their employees, and to pay employees 1 1/2 times their “regular” rate of pay (called “overtime pay”) when they work more than 40 hours a week.

However, there is a long list of “exemptions” to the overtime requirements contained in the FLSA. In other words, various types of employees – such as outside salespeople, executives, and professionals, just to name a few – are exempt from the requirement that workers be paid overtime for working in excess of 40 hours in a week.

Since 1945, it had been the law that these “exemptions” to the overtime requirement were to be “narrowly construed.” This generally meant that workers were considered to be covered by the Federal overtime law unless it was very clear that they fell within one of the listed exemptions. Doubts about whether or not a particular type of worker fell within an “exemption” would be resolved in favor of the worker, rather than the employer – i.e. such workers would not be considered “exempt,” and would be entitled to overtime.

That 70-year old rule was abruptly changed earlier this month by the US Supreme Court, in a case called Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro. There, in a 5 to 4 decision, the Court threw out the “narrow construction” rule that had limited the applicability of exemptions to the overtime requirement. Courts are now instructed to interpret exemptions “fairly” instead of “narrowly.”

This decision will have literally enormous implications on overtime lawsuits. As a general matter, the ruling will make it more difficult for employees to prove that they fall into one of the exemptions provided by the FLSA, and thus more difficult to prove that they are owed overtime pay. In the final analysis, fewer workers than before are likely to be considered “exempt” from the overtime requirement, which could prove to be a major boon to employers.

If you have any questions about your rights or obligations under the FLSA, either as an employer or as an employee, it is critically important that you consult with a competent employment law attorney. This is an area in which it is extremely easy to make a costly mistake if you are not careful!

For more information, contact Stephen E. Imm at (513) 943-5678.

Powers of attorney are written authorizations to represent or act on another person’s behalf.  The person granting the authorization is the principal and the person to whom authorization is granted is the agent.  A standard power of attorney gives the agent the authority to act immediately and identifies the specific powers that the agent may exercise.  In the case of springing powers of attorney, the document will identify the triggering event that gives the agent the authority to act at some point in the future.

These documents can be immensely useful for a principal suffering from an incapacity, which is to say, an individual who: (1) has an impaired ability to receive and evaluate information, (2) is missing, (3) is detained, be it in the penal system or otherwise, or (4) is outside of the United States and unable to return.  Notwithstanding the cause of the principal’s incapacity, the agent (if given the relevant authority in the power of attorney) may make financial decisions for the principal, purchase or sell property on behalf of the principal, make healthcare decisions, etc.  All of those actions, however, are prevented when the relevant bank, title agency, or healthcare provider wrongfully rejects a lawful power of attorney.

Lawful powers of attorney are often rejected for inane reasons including preparing the power of attorney more than six months prior to the date that the agent presents it or naming a second or successor agent.  Responding to the concerns of the constituency, members of the Ohio House of Representatives recently sponsored House Bill (H.B.) No. 446, which operates to remedy the all-too-common practice of rejecting lawful powers of attorney.  The bill does not alter language in the Ohio Revised Code, but rather, it adds the following to Chapter 1337:

(A)       As used in this section, “acknowledged” means verified before a notary public or other individual authorized to take acknowledgements.

(B)       A person shall not refuse to accept an acknowledged power of attorney for a transaction, or require an additional or different form of power of attorney for any authority granted in a statutory form power of attorney, unless one of the following applies:

  • The person has actual knowledge of the termination of the agent’s authority or of the power of attorney.
  • The person in good faith believes that the transaction is outside the scope of the authority granted to the agent in the power of attorney.
  • The person in good faith believes that the power of attorney is not valid.

(C)       A person that fails to comply with this section is subject to both of the following:

  • A court order mandating the acceptance of the power of attorney;
  • Liability for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in any action or proceeding that confirms the validity of the power of attorney or mandates acceptance of the power of attorney.

On January 16, 2018, the Ohio House of Representatives referred H.B. 446 to the Civil Justice Committee, which is where the bill remains today.  The Committee held its first hearing regarding the same on January 24, 2018.

The primary sponsors of the bill are Rep. William Seitz (R) and Rep. John Rogers (D).  The co-sponsors are Rep. Nickie Antonio (D), Rep. John Becker (R), Rep. John Boccieri (D), Rep. Nicholas Celebrezze (D), Rep. Teresa Fedor (D), Rep. Bernadine Kent (D), Rep. Michael Sheehy (D), and Rep. Kent Smith (D).

Ohio employment law attorney addresses the #MeToo movement and the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace next Tuesday, April 10 at 7 PM before Empower U at the Empower U studio at 225 Northland Blvd., Cincinnati, OH 45246.

Here is the Empower U summary of the course:

Harvey Weinstein . . . Al Franken . . . .Kevin Spacey . . . Aziz Ansari . . . .Louis CK . . . . Garrison Keillor . . . the #MeToo Movement . . . These stories and countless others like them have caused an enormous change in how sexual harassment is viewed in America, and how it is addressed by employers and employees. What can the rest of us learn from Hollywood’s Harassment Problem?
This course is literally as timely as today’s headlines! We will be discussing in detail the implications of the recent explosion in sexual harassment allegations against prominent celebrities, businessmen, politicians, and judges – yes, Judges. Attendees will learn what each of us can do to make sure that we and our companies are not in the news ourselves – six weeks, six months, or six years from now. Among the specific topics we will analyze and discuss are:

How can an employer best protect itself from sexual harassment claims in the Harvey Weinstein era?

What are the implications of the #MeToo movement for the modern workplace?

What is “sexual harassment”? What does that term actually mean in the law, as opposed to what it means in ordinary conversation?

When is a company or employer legally responsible or liable for sexual harassment committed by one of its employees?

How does the term “hostile work environment” relate to sexual harassment?

What differences exist between sexual harassment committed by a supervisor or manager, and harassment committed by a lower-level employee?

Can an employer be held legally responsible or liable for sexual harassment committed against one of its employees by an individual who is NOT an employee of the Company?

What written policies should an employer have in place regarding sexual harassment, and how should those policies be communicated to its employees?

What does a proper internal investigation of a sexual harassment complaint look like?

How is sexual harassment analyzed when the alleged harassment involves people of the same sex?

The course is free.  You can register through this link.  You can watch virtually by logging into this site after 6:50 PM.

Thanks for Steve Imm and to Empower U for bringing this important course.

Representing a Cuyahoga County community newsletter publisher, Finney Law firm has filed an appeal of the recent Eighth District Court of Appeals’ ruling in State ex rel. Meade v. Village of Bratenahl, et al.Case No. 2018-0440

Community newsletter publisher brings suit

In 2016, Pat Meade, publisher of MOREBratenahl a community newsletter focused on the community of Bratenahl, Ohio, in Cuyahoga County, brought suit against the Village Council for numerous violations of the Ohio Sunshine Law (R.C. 121.22).

Meade’s suit focused on secret ballot voting by the council as well as inaccurate and insufficient minutes by the council and its finance committee. The case presented a somewhat unaddressed issue of the Sunshine Law: can public bodies vote by secret ballot?

Prior authority

The almost universally instinctive answer is “No!” And indeed, the only caselaw or other authority on the subject also came down against secret ballot voting. In 2011, the Ohio Attorney General issued an opinion concluding that the  “‘open meetings’ requirement of R.C. 121.22 is not satisfied when members of a public body . . . vote by secret ballot.” 2011 Ohio Op. Atty Gen. No. 38. And that in fact, “[c]onstruing R.C. 121.22 as permitting a public body to vote by secret ballot also produces an unreasonable and absurd consequence.” Id.

Just twelve days prior to the issuance of the 2011 Attorney General’s Opinion, the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court issued its own ruling on the question. Again, finding that the statutory requirement that the Sunshine Law be “liberally construed to require public officials to take official action and conduct all deliberations only in open meetings encompass both discussion and voting.” Forest Hills Journal v. Forest Hills Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn., C.P. No. A-1100109, 2011 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 799, at *4 (Oct. 6, 2011).

Secret ballots in Bratenahl

The Village Council, at its January 2016 meeting voted by secret ballot in choosing their president pro tempore, even after one member questioned the legality of a secret ballot vote.

Meade, brought suit, and, during discovery the Village turned over copies of the ballot slips – appended with post-it-notes identifying the councilmember to whom each slip belonged. But in a bizarre set of circumstances, the appended ballots suggest that one member voted twice in the second round; and one ballot in each of the other rounds is unidentified.

Additionally, at one meeting, the Village entered into executive session without the minutes indicating the roll call vote; and the minutes of the council’s finance committee were simply recitations of the motions and votes, with nothing of the substance of the discussions.

Trial and Appellate Court’s response

The Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, in a un-detailed decision, simply granted summary judgment to the Village on all claims.

Plaintiff appealed the decision to the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals, which affirmed the trial court’s decision, declaring that a secret ballot vote isn’t a secret ballot vote if the public body keeps copies of the ballot slips and later produces them as part of discovery in a lawsuit; and that the minutes of one public body can be used to supplement the minutes of a different public body – and without notice to the public.

Simply put, the Court of Appeals significantly altered the landscape of Ohio Sunshine Law, and, from Plaintiff’s perspective, in a manner inconsistent with the statute and Ohio Supreme Court precedent.

Plaintiff petitions Ohio Supreme Court for review of the case

On March 23, Finney Law Firm filed its notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction wtih the Ohio Supreme Court. Then on March 26, the Ohio Coalition for Open Government filed an amicus brief urging the Court to accept jurisdiction and review the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals’ decision. Notably, the Ohio Supreme Court only accepts approximately 7% of all “jurisdictional appeals” such as this case. So even getting the case heard by the Court is a hurdle. Read our memo here, and the OCOG memo here.

Conclusion

Finney Law Firm has a proud history of advocating for open government and we are cautiously optimistic that the Ohio Supreme Court will accept jurisdiction in this case, and that we will be able to once again vindicate the people’s right to know what its government is doing.

Fox19 is reporting today that the City of Cincinnati is considering legislation to regulate Air BNB rental units in the City of Cincinnati.  Features of the proposed ordinance:

  • it would regulate short term rentals of entire dwelling units for periods of 30 days or less at a time.
  • Rentals for each unit would be limited to 90 days out of any calendar year.
  • Unit owners would have to license each unit and renew the license every year.
  • Unit owners would have to submit to annual zoning, building, safety, and housing code inspections.
  • Unit owners would have to have liability insurance on the property,
  • Unit owners would be required to pay taxes on the rental income, including a transient occupancy tax.

The purposes for the ordinance  from the Fox19 are:

  • to reduce the negative impact of short term rentals
  • to protect residential tenants who otherwise would be evicted to allow for conversion of their  units for AirBNB occupants
  • to keep AirBNB renters safer.

Read the Fox19 article here.

Banks and other loan providers in Kentucky must follow strict state laws regarding the interest rates they may charge. What follows is a brief summary of interest rate laws in the state.

Legal maximum rates and judgment rates

In Kentucky, the maximum legal interest rate is 8 percent, unless the parties agree otherwise. Even in those exceptions, parties may not agree to a rate that is more than 4 percent over the discount rate of the Federal Reserve Bank or 19 percent (whichever is lower) for principal amounts of $15,000 or less.

The standard interest rate for court judgments is 6 percent, but if the obligation arose from a contract that specified a different rate, then that contract rate still applies, no matter if it’s higher or lower than 6 percent.

Home loans

Kentucky law has a variety of stipulations aimed at preventing predatory lending practices. For example, residential mortgages between $15,000 and $200,000, with closing costs of either $3,000 or 6 percent of the total loan, have special rules associated with them. Lenders may not charge prepayment penalties for these loans unless the borrower receives a written offer without a prepayment penalty. Then, if that offer gets rejected, the penalty cannot be more than three percent for the first year, two percent for the second year, one percent for the third year or any amount after three years.

Lenders can charge fees to change or renew a high-cost home loan or defer payments unless the fees are less than half the fees to refinance or the borrower is in default and the modifications are in the borrower’s best interest.

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit finneylawfirm.com.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.isoc.net; 513.797.2850.

 

March 11-17 is Sunshine Week, highlighting and celebrating laws aimed at preserving transparency and accountability in government.

In Ohio R.C. 121.22 (the Open Meetings Act) and 149.43 (the Public Records Act), are the main sources of law protecting the citizenry’s right to know and appreciate what is being done in its name.

In the past year, Finney Law Firm’s public interest practice group has obtained results for our clients, obtaining public records, and forcing open the doors of government.

State ex rel. Coalition Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes v. Winton Woods School District – Several and Serial violations of the Open Meetings Act; illegal executive sessions, including numerous executive sessions in which the school board simply recited the laundry list of personnel related matters set forth in the Open Meetings Act.

State of Ohio ex rel. Mick Higgins v. City of Springdale – voting by secret ballot; illegal executive sessions.

Even without litigation, we have obtained results for our clients in drafting and submitting public records requests to public bodies throughout Ohio to allow our clients to better monitor their local officials.

Currently we are preparing for an appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court in a case involving deficient meeting minutes and secret ballot voting by a village council in northern Ohio. Expect to hear more about that case soon.

Click here to learn more about Ohio’s Sunshine Laws in the “Yellow Book” distributed by State Auditor David Yost and Attorney General Mike DeWine.

Click here to read more about Ohio’s Sunshine Laws.

Need help with your local government? Contact us here.

Someone owes you money.

But you have been slow to assign the collection to an attorney for fear of the legal fees and expenses.  This concern certainly is well-founded.

However, Finney Law Firm (a) has the experience, tools and “attitude” to maximize your return from that activity, and (b) is willing to work with you on creative fee relationships, so that the risk and cost of the collection activity does not fall fully on the your shoulders.

The challenge

In every piece of prospective litigation, I attempt to analyze with the client the three components to litigation success: (a) liability (establishing the legal basis the other party owes you money [for example, is the contract clear and the breach easy to establish?]), (b) damages and (c) collectibility.

Collectibility

Let us start at the end: does this target defendant have a pot to pee in?

If you were to get a judgment of any size against him, could we collect from this debtor the sums needed to make the litigation worthwhile form the inception?  Many times the answer is “no.”  If so, you might want to walk away from the matter.

Does the debtor own a house?  A business property?  If so, we can fairly quickly ascertain the mortgage indebtedness versus the value of the property.

Does the debtor own a business?  Car?  Other assets?  Many times debtors structure their lives and their assets in such a way that a creditor really can’t get anything from them — their house in in their wife’s name, and their other assets are well-hidden.

Liability

Ahhh, liability.

The client many times relates to us that liability is “open and shut.”  We file suit and the other side “surely will settle.”

Unfortunately it does not always pan out that way.  Clients frequently don’t understand the facts of their own case, don’t know all the facts, and wear rose-colored glasses about their prospects of success.  Further, even the simplest fact pattern that clearly leads to liability can be time-consuming and laborious in Court to bring to conclusion.

The client needs a realistic understanding of their chances of success and the Court path to a final enforceable judgement.

Damages

And that brings us to the damages calculation.  Defendants, Plaintiffs and Courts all have differing perspectives on how to calculate damages numbers.  And a separate blog entry would have to explore that issue in more depth.  But take, for example, the sale of a house.  Our client is the seller.  The buyer is clearly in breach.  But the seller sixty days later re-sells the house to another buyer for $5,000 more than the buyer in breach agreed to pay.  (And in today’s go-go real estate marketplace, that’s not an uncommon occurrence). What “damages” has the seller sustained from a clear breach of contract?  Other than the time-value of holding the property (taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance), likely none.

Collection

So, once you file suit and convince the Judge to sign the entry granting an award of damages against a defendant,  you are “off to the races,”  Right?  Well, not exactly.

We have to first identify assets and income streams.  Does the target own a piece of real property?  A bank account?  A job? Securities accounts?  Do they own a closely-held business?  The Finney Law Firm has gum-shoe and cyber assets and relationships that help us to learn of the income and assets of clients in the collection process.

Tools for enforcement

Our tools to force payment of a legal judgment include:

  • Attaching bank accounts.
  • Garnishing wages.
  • Liening and foreclosing on real property.
  • Seizing and selling personal property such as office furniture and equipment, cars and manufacturing equipment. (This one usually gets their attention and frequently a quick check!)
  • A creditor’s bill to force a third party who owes the deadbeat money to instead pay it to you.  These are very powerful.
  • A receivership to place income-producing assets in the hands of a third party whose job it is to assure you are paid from the income stream of the asset or its liquidation.
  • A Judgment Debtor Examination forces a creditor to tell you — under oath — where they are “hiding” their assets so that you can go and grab them.
  • Use of subpoena power to learn from third parties where assets are being hidden.
  • Working through the intricacies of bankruptcy court to either avoid the collections limitations the Court imposes or maximize the collection through their offices.
  • Involuntary bankruptcy.  It takes three creditors banding together to place a debtor into bankruptcy, but this tools forces all the debtor’s cards on the table and stops them from playing games with assets that should belong to you.
  • Fraudulent transfer actions can un-do illegal transfers of assets to friends and family members.  Most powerfully, the act of the fraudulent transfer to these third parties causes them to become defendants in that new action —  putting them on the hook for the debt, plus punitive damages and attorneys fees — for participating in the scheme.

Creative fee relationships

We are not oblivious to the challenges our clients face of withering legal fees and endless court appearances to collect a small and simple debt.  But at the same time, the tremendous work many times required to get a judgment and pursue it through collection also is known to us.

However, if we are going to recommend that a client proceed with a collections action — which necessarily means the economics should work out positively for the client — we are always willing to engage in a discussion about creative fee relationships (hourly fees, flat fees and contingent fees) to achieve the desired end.

The idea on a contingent fee is the more you collect, the more we make — everyone should be happy if the “ring the bell.”  But on the flip side, it it turns out to be a dry well — and many collection actions that seem promising on the front end turn out to be a dry well on the back end — then we share in the pain.

Conclusion

Collections work can be great fun, outmaneuvering a defendant who knows he owes the debt, but is using his wits — legal and illegal — to prevent you from getting to those assets.

So, let your deadbeats become our firm’s problem and allow us to turn that bad debt into an asset.  Call Chris Finney (513-943-6655) or Julie Gugino (513-943-5669) to learn how we can help you.

Finney Law Firm attorney Eli N. Kraft-Jacobs

So, you have decided to cease operations, close down your business, and begin the process of dissolving your entity.  You know that there are formalities that must be attended to, but the what/when/how remains elusive.  The first step is to identify if the entity is a corporation or a limited liability company.  Notwithstanding some unique provisions of the Ohio Revised Code, and without discussing the process for nonprofit corporations, professional associations, or partnerships, the following is a general overview of the steps necessary to dissolve domestic corporations and limited liability companies in the State of Ohio.

Electing to Dissolve a Corporation:

A corporation may be dissolved voluntarily by the adoption of a resolution of dissolution by the directors or by the shareholders.  The requirements for dissolving the corporation by resolution of the directors differ from those for dissolving the corporation by the shareholders.

Once a resolution of dissolution has been adopted, and after obtaining the necessary tax clearance, a Certificate of Dissolution shall be prepared, which must include pertinent information for dissolving the corporation.  There are other notification requirements that must be met prior to filing the Certificate of Dissolution with the Ohio Secretary of State.

A corporation may also be dissolved judicially by either: (1) an order of the supreme court or a court of appeals or (2) an order of the court of common pleas in the county where the entity’s principal office is located.  If this is the path your company is taking, the good news is that the relevant court will, purposefully or otherwise, identify the things that need to be accomplished in order to dissolve and wind up the affairs of your company.  The bad news, of course, is that a court is ordering the dissolution of your entity and much of the process will be public record.  If the dissolution occurs pursuant to the supreme court or court of appeals, then the court may either: (a) order the directors to effectuate the dissolution and wind up the entity in the same manner as would occur during a voluntary dissolution or (b) direct the relevant court of common pleas to effectuate the same.  A court of common pleas may only order dissolution in an action brought by the shareholders, the directors, or the prosecuting attorney of the relevant county.

Regarding dissolution in a court of common pleas, if the action is brought by the shareholders, the court may only order dissolution if: (a) the articles have been canceled or the period of existence has expired, (b) the corporation is insolvent and dissolution is the only means through which to protect the creditors, or (c) the corporation has failed or is unable to meet its objectives.  If the action is brought by the directors, the court may order dissolution if there is an even number of directors who are unable to break a deadlock or there is an uneven number of directors, but the shareholders are deadlocked on a vote to elect new directors.  If the action is brought by the relevant prosecuting attorney, the court may order dissolution if it is found that the corporation was organized for, or otherwise engages in, activity including, but not limited to, the following:  prostitution; gambling; loan sharking; drug abuse or illegal drug distribution; counterfeiting; obscenity; extortion; corruption of law enforcement offices or other public officers, officials, or any employees; or any other criminal activity.

Electing to Dissolve a Limited Liability Company:

The process of dissolving a multiple member limited liability company (“LLC”) is similar to dissolving a corporation.  Regarding voluntary dissolutions, an LLC shall be dissolved upon the occurrence of any of the following: (1) the expiration of the period of existence as stated in the operating agreement or the articles of organization, (2) the occurrence of one or more events specified in the operating agreement as causing dissolution, (3) the unanimous written agreement of all members of the LLC, (4) the withdrawal of a member of the LLC unless otherwise stated in the operating agreement, or (5) a decree of judicial dissolution.  A Certificate of Dissolution must be filed with the Ohio Secretary of State in order to effectuate the dissolution of the LLC.

Regarding tribunal dissolutions, a tribunal may declare an LLC dissolved and order the business to be wound up upon the occurrence of any of the following: (1) an event making it unlawful for all or most of the business to continue or (2) a determination by the tribunal that any of the following is or are true: (a) the economic purpose of the LLC is likely to be unreasonably frustrated, (2) a member of the LLC has engaged in conduct relating to the business that makes it not reasonably practicable to carry on business with such member, or (c) it is not otherwise practicable to carry on the business.

The process for dissolving a single member LLC differs from the above process for a multiple member LLC.

Voluntary Winding Up:

Once an entity voluntarily elects to dissolve and files a Certificate of Dissolution with the Ohio Secretary of State, the relevant parties are authorized to proceed with the winding up of the corporation/LLC.  Winding up is the process of selling the assets of the business, paying off creditors, and distributing any remaining assets to the  members or shareholders in accordance with Ohio  law.  This is separate and distinct from a judicial or tribunal dissolution, during which the court will control the process of winding up.

There are some minor distinctions between LLCs and corporations with regard to the winding up process, but they largely follow the same path.

It is important to note that dissolution is not a magic wand with which one may avoid company liabilities.

While the dissolution process may seem straight forward, you should always seek legal counsel to ensure the I’s are dotted and the T’s crossed.

Imagine you are trying to sell a piece of property, but no one is making any offers.  That is, until a prospective purchaser offers to buy the property on a land installment contract.  You can hardly contain your relief at being able to move on, so you sign the contract without understanding some of the terms, or even what a land installment contract is.  That leads to the questions, “What did I just sign” and “Did I agree to something I shouldn’t have?”

A land installment contract (also known as an installment contract or a land contract) is an agreement between a seller (vendor) of real property and a buyer (vendee), pursuant to which the vendor agrees to sell real property after the vendee pays a series of installments and other obligations set forth in the land installment contract (such as payment of real estate taxes and assessments, utilities, etc.) over a set period of time.  Essentially, the vendor is acting as a lender in the transaction by allowing the buyer to make a series of small payments not unlike a mortgage payment.  From a legal perspective, the vendor is the legal title holder and the real estate and the vendee is the equitable owner of the property.

Selling on a land installment contract can be beneficial when: (i) the vendor has unsuccessfully listed their property on the market for a long period of time, (ii) the vendor does not need the equity from their property in order to pursue the purchase of their next piece of property, or (iii) a prospective purchaser is having a difficult time obtaining traditional financing (in which case a sizable down payment is preferential).

In addition to the standard provisions you need to watch out for (e.g., the purchase price, the closing date, inspection terms, etc.) there are clauses that can be problematic for the selling party.  One such clause is the vendee’s right to make repairs of undisclosed items on the property, and then deduct the cost of such repairs from the final payment.  That clause could sound as innocuous as something like this:

In the event that the vendors fail to pay any amounts due and owing hereunder, the vendees may pay such amount at buyers’ complete and sole discretion, and thereafter deduct the amount of such payment from the final payment.

On its face, this clause doesn’t sound problematic, but when coupled with other clauses in the land installment contract, such as the following, it becomes an issue:

In the event that any representation or warranty of vendors is false, vendees shall have the right, at their absolute discretion, to either: (i) rescind this agreement and refund all amounts paid under the same or (ii) reduce the final payment owed to vendors for any and all losses, liabilities, costs, or expenses associated with vendors’ false representation or warranty; provided, however, that no reduction may occur for losses, liabilities, costs, or expenses associated with any replacement, maintenance or repair of an item on the property that was conspicuously disclosed to vendees.

Essentially, this gives the vendee the power to make repairs on any item on the property that is in need of repair, which need is at the vendee’s absolute discretion.  The scrupulous vendee may elect to fix the most minor damage, regardless of the cost, because the cost will be deducted from the final payment and the vendee won’t lose any money.  Instead, the vendee obtains all of the benefit, and the cost for such benefit will come straight from the vendor’s pocket.

Ultimately, if your property has been on the market for a long period of time and a prospective vendee offers you a land installment contract, you can breathe your sigh of relief, but do not sign the land installment contract until you are absolutely sure you understand the terms contained therein.  It is highly recommended that you seek legal counsel to represent your interests prior to entering into the land installment contract.

Contact Finney Law Firm to see how we can help you with your real estate needs and transactions.