Hi, How Can We Help You?

Category Archives: Miscellaneous

Former State Troopers Sue London Mayor for Libel in Response to Podcast Comments

Author By Todd McMurtryPosted on

Social media platforms and podcasts give individuals the chance to reach a broad audience without having to go through a traditional media outlet. This can be empowering for someone who cannot convince a newspaper, broadcast station or book publisher that their message is worthwhile. On the other hand, without a structure in place to filter out potentially defamatory content, speakers risk serious legal problems if they make a false statement about someone else.

Even municipal officials can face libel suits. The mayor of a small Laurel County town is now the defendant in two separate legal actions stemming from comments he made on a podcast. According to two former Kentucky state troopers, London Mayor Randall Weddle made false and damaging statements about them. Elijah Jarvis has also sued Weddle based on material from a True CrimeCast episode. 

Brothers James and John Phelps say that Weddle accused them of sexual misconduct and other serious crimes, including murder. Their legal action alleges that these false statements have harmed their career prospects and reputations within their community. 

Defamation claims in Kentucky generally require a plaintiff to demonstrate the following four things:

  • False, defamatory statement — Should the case go to court, the trier of fact will evaluate the truth of Weddle’s comments. In some cases, defamation plaintiffs must show how the statements at issue harmed them. However, baseless accusations of criminal activity and sexual misconduct are known as defamation per se, meaning that we can assume that they would damage plaintiffs’ reputations.
  • Publication to a third party — Speaking a damaging falsehood to a third party is slander, while wider publication, such as through a podcast, constitutes libel. According to news reports, the True CrimeCast has more than 1,000 YouTube subscribers. 
  • Fault, amounting to at least negligence — In cases involving public figures, actual malice on the defendant’s part is required. This means that the speaker knew what they said was a lie or acted in reckless disregard of the truth. When the plaintiff is not a public figure, liability only requires negligence on the defendant’s part.
  • Damages — There are several ways to show damages stemming from defamation, including harm to career opportunities and symptoms of emotional distress. Even unproven allegations of criminal and sexual misconduct could change someone’s life measurably. 

Whether it’s on a podcast or anywhere else, false statements about you should not go unchecked. Hemmer Wessels McMurtry PLLC in Fort Mitchell handles libel and slander actions so that those who defame others are held to account. To speak with an experienced Kentucky lawyer, please call 859-344-1188 or contact us online. 

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit finneylawfirm.com.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.isoc.net; 513.797.2850.

 

Reports Allege Deceased Lexington Estate Planning Attorney Engaged in Widespread Misconduct

Author By Todd McMurtryPosted on

Americans are generally reluctant to discuss personal financial issues. In many ways, keeping this information private is often a good idea, but there are situations where close family members, and even spouses, are not completely aware of an individual’s assets and debts. Once someone has died, the administration of their estate or trust clearly identifies property that is to be passed on to the decedent’s beneficiaries. Unfortunately, it might be difficult to discern if they received less than they should have as a result of legal malpractice. 

A lawsuit alleges that a Lexington estate planning attorney misappropriated millions of dollars from his clients. The allegations have triggered one of the largest legal practice fraud investigations in Kentucky’s history. According to the accusations, Delmon Lyle McQuinn’s actions might have affected more than 3,000 people. McQuinn died by suicide on March 18, 2025, shortly after the accusations surfaced.

The complaint of 79-year-old Linda Helton claims that McQuinn wrongly diverted millions of dollars from assets owned by her deceased husband. When her attorney reviewed the facts, he says that the discovered a widespread pattern of deception that included fraudulent wills and trusts. Potential forms of misconduct in the McQuinn matter include breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, forgery, theft by deception, intentional infliction of emotional distress and elder abuse.

While not every instance of estate planning malpractice has the dramatic scope of the McQuinn case, a lawyer’s failure to meet professional standards can have a devastating effect on a victim’s family. Even if an attorney is merely careless, rather than dishonest, serious problems might arise. Failure to conform with legal requirements or address concerns about incapacity could lead to the invalidation of testamentary documents. Errors involving commingled accounts or lost papers can also result in squandered funds or unnecessary litigation. 

When lawyers seek to divert client funds for themselves, it can be difficult to identify the misconduct. From the moment you suspect that something might be amiss, you should reach out to a qualified attorney who can assess the situation and investigate whether any improper activity took place. In the meantime, you can request an accounting of trust assets and transactions, as well as any records involving funds under the lawyer’s control. 

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit finneylawfirm.com.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.isoc.net; 513.797.2850.

 

New Kentucky Law Safeguards Rights of Construction Contractors to Sue

Author By Todd McMurtryPosted on

Disagreements over the nonpayment of construction contracts occur frequently. Contractors who have finished a job based on the expectation that they will receive full payment on completion often find themselves forced to chase property owners for the designated funds. In some cases, the hiring individual or entity will formulate some excuse as to why the agreed-upon amount is not being provided. Other times, no explanation is given for the nonpayment. 

Though some legal protections were in place for construction contractors, a new Kentucky law bolsters their ability to secure the compensation they’ve earned. Under Senate Bill 76, when a contract with a private party is valued at $2 million or more, any portion of the payment that the owner retains subject to project completion must be held in an escrow account. Once the job is done in a satisfactory manner, the owner must provide a release that triggers transfer of the escrow funds to the contractor. Parties to construction contracts are no longer permitted to negotiate away this escrow requirement. 

Likewise, the law bars contract provisions that purport to eliminate or undermine a contractor’s right to seek relief in court or waive other essential rights conferred under Kentucky law. By barring enforcement of these terms, the bill safeguards contractors from being coerced into unfavorable language that could put them at an unfair legal disadvantage. However, the bill does note that binding arbitration can be utilized as alternative dispute resolution method.

Among the law’s most important elements is its protection against clauses that unjustly prevent contractors from recovering costs or damages due to delays—especially when such delays stem from factors within the control of the contracting entity. Many construction law conflicts stem from situations where a project cannot be completed on time. There are numerous reasons why an unforeseen delay could occur, such as weather, regulatory hurdles or bureaucratic inefficiencies. By prohibiting clauses that put the entire economic burden of any delay on the contractor, this provision fosters a more equitable distribution of risk and responsibility.

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit finneylawfirm.com.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.isoc.net; 513.797.2850.

 

Tortious Interference Claim Dismissed in Case Involving Alleged Use of Improper Horseshoe

Author By Todd McMurtryPosted on

Kentucky is recognized worldwide as the capital of thoroughbred racing. The people and businesses devoted to developing winning horses pursue their goals vigorously on the track, in the paddock, and sometimes at the courthouse. A dispute arising from the 2022 Lukas Classic race led the connections of one horse to seek relief through a tortious interference lawsuit. 

Hot Rod Charlie came in first at the Grade 2 race ahead of Rich Strike, but the second-place horse’s owner alleged that the purported winner competed with non-permissible shoes. Specifically, Rick Dawson claimed that Hot Rod Charlie’s front shoes appeared to have toe grabs, which are not allowed on dirt under the rules of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority (HISA). However, HISA rejected the appeal, holding that the toe grabs originally on the shoes had been ground down sufficiently to comply with the rule. 

Rich Strike’s connections did not give up though, filing a business tort action claiming that Hot Rod Charlie’s connections intentionally interfered with their valid expectancy that Rich Strike would win a fairly conducted race. Consequently, Rich Strike’s connections sought more than $300,000 in damages covering the additional purse money, winner’s trophy and increased stud fees that they said would have accompanied a first-place finish.  

The court rejected the use of a tortious interference claim to overturn the race result. Judge Annie O’Connell in Jefferson Circuit Court focused on the fact that the relief sought by Rich Strike’s connections bypassed the federal law that created HISA and the regulatory structure that governs horse racing in the United States. Consequently, she held that federal law pre-empted a state court’s ability to determine if a rule violation occurred. Judge O’Connell reasoned that a ruling in favor of Rich Strike’s connections would have undermined HISA’s established decision, compromising its authority in maintaining fair play and safety standards in the industry. 

While the court ruled that the regulatory framework barred a tortious interference action in this case, there are various types of situations where a third party intentionally disrupts a contractual or business relationship between two other entities. 

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit finneylawfirm.com.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.isoc.net; 513.797.2850.

 

State Sues Temu, Alleging Theft of Customer Data

Author By Todd McMurtryPosted on

In fewer than three years, the Chinese-owned online shopping platform Temu has become immensely popular, with hundreds of millions of visits each month. The website is known for offering various types of products, including clothes and household goods, at a low cost. Though Temu continues to attract massive traffic, it has also drawn criticism for the quality of its products and the labor practices used by the site’s China-based suppliers, Now, the Kentucky Attorney General has taken legal action alleging that the e-commerce giant is illegally capturing and using customers’ personal information. 

The lawsuit filed by Attorney General Russell Coleman accuses Temu of violating the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act (KCPA) by collecting sensitive personally-identifiable information (PII) from users without their knowledge or consent. While the complaint notes that this activity in and of itself is unlawful, it also raises concerns based on the fact that Temu, and the company that owns it, are based in China. According to the Attorney General, this means that the Chinese government has access to the data captured from online shoppers.

Temu also allegedly designed its much-downloaded app to evade detection, further compounding privacy and security harms. According to the Attorney General, such intentional obfuscation not only undermines trust but also poses significant risks to consumers who are unaware of the extent to which their information is being exploited. Both Apple and Google have temporarily suspended the Temu app from their respective online stores due to privacy concerns before restoring it.  

State investigators have purportedly found that information gathered by Temu goes well beyond what is required to complete digital transactions, including WiFi network information and reports of other apps installed on users’ devices. The complaint characterizes the Temu app as a hacking mechanism. Other allegations in the complaint involve the sale of counterfeit merchandise and the misappropriation of trademarks owned by Kentucky entities. 

While the Temu case is obviously high-profile, small and large companies alike that do business in Kentucky need to be aware of the rules governing data collection. The state’s Consumer Data Protection Act goes into effect at the beginning of 2026 and might require significant changes in how a company handles privacy issues and obtains consent for the collection of personal information. If you are accused of laws governing online commerce or other legal standards, don’t hesitate to retain a business litigation attorney who can assess how the law applies to your case and counter the allegations brought against you. 

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit finneylawfirm.com.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.isoc.net; 513.797.2850.

 

How to Plan Effectively for a Business Divorce

Author By Todd McMurtryPosted on

A “business divorce” refers to the change in ownership or dissolution of a closely held business, which can be as complex and contentious as a marital divorce. This term encompasses a range of scenarios, from one partner buying out another to the complete unwinding of a company’s operations. 

Before undertaking such a drastic action, owners must consider several critical factors to ensure the business divorce process is handled with minimal disruption to the company and its assets. Here is an overview:

  • Take stock of the reasons and goals — The reasons could range from personal conflicts between owners to divergent visions for the company’s future. It’s also important for all parties to articulate their goals for the divorce, whether it’s a desire for independent operation, financial settlement or strategic realignment of the business.
  • Assess legal and financial implications — Owners should review any existing partnership agreements, bylaws or shareholder agreements that dictate the process for resolving disputes and exiting the business. These documents often outline buy-sell agreements, valuation processes and other critical procedures. Absent such agreements, state laws will govern the dissolution process, which might not align with the owners’ personal or business interests.
  • Undertake a valuation of the business — Determining the value of the business is a contentious aspect of many business divorces. Accurate valuation is essential for fair asset distribution. Owners should consider hiring independent appraisers to provide a valuation that all parties can agree on. This avoids further disputes and assure partners they are receiving their rightful share.
  • Measure the impact on stakeholders — A business divorce can affect a wide range of stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers and creditors. Owners should consider how the divorce will impact these groups and plan accordingly. Maintaining transparency with stakeholders during the divorce can mitigate negative impacts and maintain business continuity.
  • Consider negotiation and conflict resolution — Ideally, a business divorce should be resolved through negotiation rather than litigation. This can save time, reduce costs and preserve relationships to the extent possible. However, it requires compromise and understanding from all parties involved. Where negotiation fails, mediation or arbitration might be viable alternatives, offering a non-adversarial approach to settlement of key issues.

Given the complexities involved, it is advisable for each party to seek counsel from a business divorce attorney who can offer comprehensive services, making sure that valuations are done fairly, that all assets and liabilities are accounted for and that all governmental rules are complied with.

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit finneylawfirm.com.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.isoc.net; 513.797.2850.

 

Can You Bring a Legal Malpractice Suit Even if Your Case Settled?

Author By Todd McMurtryPosted on

Legal malpractice is generally defined as failing to adhere to the professional duty of care that an attorney owes to clients. Usually, a malpractice claim is lodged after the client received a disappointing result in an underlying court case. But does the client have the right to sue if the case below settled?

The short answer is yes. You can sue for malpractice even if your underlying case never saw the inside of a courtroom. However, proving malpractice in a settlement scenario presents unique challenges. Courts generally presume that settlements are entered into voluntarily, which can make it difficult to argue that the settlement was the result of attorney negligence or misconduct.

The attorney’s duty of care requires him or her to act with the diligence and promptness expected of an attorney of similar ability and training under the circumstances. This includes adequately preparing for and researching the case, effectively communicating with the client and acting in the client’s best interest at all times. When the attorney fails to adhere to this duty in any respect, it could lead to an unfair or inadequate settlement

Here are specific types of conduct that can justify a legal malpractice claim:

  • Misrepresentation or fraud — If an attorney misleads a client about the strength of their case or pressures them into settling under false pretenses, this could constitute malpractice. For example, if an attorney assures the client that their case is weak when it is not, to coerce them into accepting a low settlement offer.
  • Failure to investigate or prepare — An attorney’s failure to properly research or prepare a case can leave the client in a weaker bargaining position and lead to a less favorable settlement. This might include failing to gather key evidence or neglecting to consult with necessary experts.
  • Conflict of interest — If an attorney has a personal or financial interest that conflicts with the client’s interest, such as a desire to settle quickly to move on to other cases or personal relationships with the opposing party, this could compromise the attorney’s ability to advocate effectively for the client.
  • Failure to communicate — Attorneys must keep their clients informed about significant developments in their case, including settlement offers. Failure to communicate such offers, or to adequately explain the implications of accepting or rejecting them, can be grounds for a malpractice claim.
  • Failure to negotiate effectively — If an attorney accepts an unreasonably low settlement without attempting to negotiate more favorable terms, this might also be seen as a breach of their duty of care.

To succeed in a legal malpractice lawsuit based on a settlement, the client must prove that but for the attorney’s negligence, a better settlement or verdict would have been likely. This often requires expert testimony from other legal professionals who can attest to the average recoveries for similar cases in the same geographic area. Since settlements are typically confidential, comparing the settlement to verdict sizes in similar cases can be a useful way to gauge whether the attorney made a substandard effort. A professional malpractice attorney can build the strongest case possible in this regard.

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit finneylawfirm.com.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.isoc.net; 513.797.2850.

 

The Most Frequent Causes of Business Litigation

Author By Todd McMurtryPosted on

As a business owner or operator, protecting your company’s interests requires understanding how to avoid and cope with problems that can end up in litigation. Disputes related to business operations, transactions, and partnerships can escalate quickly if not addressed proactively. 

Here is a summary of some of the most common causes of commercial litigation:

  • Breach of contract — When a party fails to meet their contractual commitments, such as by non-delivery of goods, late payments or substandard performance, it can disrupt your business immediately and in a longer term. Litigation may be needed to redress the issue. Business owner can mitigate these risks by ensuring that contracts are clear, detailed and enforceable.
  • Intellectual property infringement — Your intellectual property (IP) is one of your business’s most valuable assets. Protecting your IP through proper registration and vigilant monitoring can safeguard your competitive edge in the market. However, litigation may be needed if you believe another entity has infringed upon your patents, trademarks, copyrights or trade secrets. 
  • Negligence and business torts — Negligence and other tort claims may arise when another party’s careless actions cause harm to your business or its assets. These can include defamation, interference with contractual relationships or failure to exercise reasonable care in shipping. Such cases often require comprehensive evidence to establish fault and quantify damages.
  • Trade issues and disputes — Operating in a global marketplace exposes your business to complex trade disputes, including conflicts over international trade agreements, import/export regulations, and compliance with trade laws. Navigating these issues requires a deep understanding of both domestic and international legal frameworks.
  • Misrepresentation and fraud — If you’ve been misled by false information or intentional deception in a business transaction, you may have grounds for a fraud claim. Misrepresentation can have severe financial repercussions, and addressing it swiftly is critical. Proving fraud involves demonstrating intent, false representation, reliance, and damages.
  • Partnership and joint venture disagreements — Business partnerships and joint ventures can be lucrative but also fraught with potential conflicts over management decisions, profit-sharing, and fiduciary responsibilities. Disputes can escalate if there are ambiguities in your partnership agreements or if parties breach their fiduciary duties. Regularly reviewing these agreements can help prevent misunderstandings.
  • Non-disclosure agreement (NDA) disputes — NDAs protect your sensitive business information. If a party breaches an NDA by improperly disclosing confidential information, it can jeopardize your competitive position. Ensuring that NDAs are comprehensive and enforceable is key to protecting your business secrets.

Since any of these outbreaks disrupting your business, it is vital to consult with a skilled business litigation attorney immediately when a dispute arises. Early intervention allows for a thorough assessment of your case, the preparation of a strong defense and the exploration of alternative dispute resolution strategies, such as mediation or arbitration, which can save your business time and resources.

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit finneylawfirm.com.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.isoc.net; 513.797.2850.

 

Do’s and Don’ts of Business Divorce Negotiations

Author By Todd McMurtryPosted on

In a business divorce, where owners of an enterprise part ways, structuring negotiations effectively can help prevent prolonged disputes, preserve relationships and ensure a fair division of assets and responsibilities. 

Here are some do’s and don’ts of conducting business divorce negotiations, along with insights on when mediation may be beneficial.

Do’s:

  • Prioritize respectful communication — Discuss reasons for the split between owners in a dispassionate, professional manner. Respectful communication fosters trust and can prevent misunderstandings that might escalate the conflict.
  • Establish Shared Goals — Identifying the parties’ intentions can serve as a foundation for the negotiation. Whether it’s the continued success of the business or fair compensation to a departing owner, keep the focus on constructive outcomes rather than on personal grievances.
  • Prepare a comprehensive agenda — Your agenda should cover and prioritize all relevant issues, including treatment of financial assets, intellectual property, customer lists, ongoing projects, liabilities and personnel. This helps guide the discussions and allows parties to gauge progress.
  • Involve legal and financial experts — Professionals can clarify complex issues, help prevent costly mistakes and provide unbiased perspectives that aid in reaching fair settlements.
  • Be open to compromise — Flexibility in negotiations can bring about a less acrimonious outcome, which is important if the parties must maintain any future business relationships.

Don’ts: 

  • Don’t let emotions speak for you — Remain calm and focused on the business aspects. Outbursts or even passive aggressiveness can throw the negotiations off course.
  • Don’t rush the process — While efficiency is important, rushing through negotiations often leads to missed details or unresolved issues. Take the necessary time to address every point thoroughly to avoid future conflicts or financial repercussions.
  • Steer clear of public disputes — Dragging the split into the public sphere can only hurt the business’s image and reputation. Try to project a message that all is well with the company.
  • Avoid taking intractable positions — Approaching negotiations with a combative mindset can derail progress. Refrain from issuing ultimatums or threats, which tend to create hostility and resistance.

If business divorce negotiations become contentious or reach an impasse, mediation provides a cooperative environment to work out solutions. The mediator, a neutral third party, can guide discussions, defuse emotions and divide the dispute into smaller elements, which can help move past gridlocks. Mediation is especially beneficial when there’s a power imbalance or if one party is less experienced in business negotiations. A mediator can level the playing field and ensure that both parties feel heard and respected. 

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit finneylawfirm.com.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.isoc.net; 513.797.2850.

 

How Business Defamation Differs From Personal Defamation

Author By Todd McMurtryPosted on

Defamation is a false statement presented as fact that injures the reputation of the person or entity about whom it is made. In a lawsuit alleging defamation of a business, the damages that need to be proved must be related to the business’s economic losses. These can consist of harmed relationships with customers, suppliers, and investors, ultimately affecting sales, profits, and overall market position. Unlike in personal defamation actions, business defamation damages are usually not presumed.

The following are types of damages that a business can prove in a defamation lawsuit:

  • Actual damages — A business can demonstrate that the defamatory statements have caused direct financial harm, such as loss of sales, customers or contracts; reduced profits; or expenses incurred in counteracting the defamatory statements. Actual damages are often the primary form of relief sought, as they represent the concrete impact on the business’s bottom line.
  • Reputational harm — In proving reputational harm, the business must show that the defamatory statement resulted in a loss of goodwill, that is, the trust and loyalty among customers that the company has built over time. This may be difficult to quantify precisely but can be inferred from other evidence, such as customer testimonials, expert testimony, or financial performance indicators.
  • Loss of business relationships — Defamation can cause a company to lose valuable relationships with suppliers, distributors or other business partners. If the defamatory statement falsely suggests that the business is unreliable or unethical, it could result in a diminution of trust and credit, which could harm the company’s operations and bottom line.
  • Punitive damages — These damages might be awarded if the business can prove that the defamation was committed with actual malice, that is, with knowledge of the falsity of the statement or with reckless disregard for the truth. Punitive damages are awarded not to compensate for harm but to punish the wrongdoer and deter similar conduct in the future.

The primary difference between defamation of a business and defamation of an individual lies in the relative availability of presumed damages. For certain types of defamation of an individual, damages for reputational harm need not be proved, such as when the defamatory statements are classified as libel per se or slander per se. Examples are false statements alleging someone committed a crime, has an infectious or contagious disease, has been engaged in sexual promiscuity or is unfitness to perform their profession. The reason for presumed damages is that an individual’s personal reputation is usually of unique importance and that defamation has a direct, immediate social impact. 

For a business, however, presumed damages are generally not awarded unless the plaintiff can show actual malice or demonstrate that the defamation was of a nature that inherently caused harm to the business’s commercial reputation. An example is where the false statements impugned the plaintiff’s trademark or brand to the point that it is irreparably weakened. Although the harm is speculative, it may warrant damages if it is reasonably quantifiable and traceable to the alleged defamation. 

About Finney Law Firm, LLC

Founded in 2014, FLF has grown to 15 attorneys located in offices in Eastgate and downtown Cincinnati with five major practice areas: Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Commercial Litigation and Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation.  FLF has the unique claim to three 9-0 victories at the United States Supreme Court for its public interest practice along with breakthrough class action work.

FLF also has an affiliated title insurance company, Ivy Pointe Title, LLC, that closes and insures nearly a thousand commercial and residential real estate transactions annually.

For more information about Finney Law Firm, visit finneylawfirm.com.

Media Contact: Mickey McClanahan; mickey@finneylawfirm.isoc.net; 513.797.2850.

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 … 31